We've done a few investigative pieces (enterprise pieces would be more accurate). In fact, after one piece I did based on FOIL requests to state agencies, one highly placed local official said to me, "imagine, a news organization that actually does investigations," which was clearly a slam at the local daily newspaper, or the Daily Snooze as just about everybody in town calls it. Yes, most of our news is done on the cheap. I take what I can get where I can get it, and while I have a couple of "enterprise" projects in development, for a multitude of reasons, I haven't been able to work on them the past several weeks. Currently, the only staff is me and my wife. My wife isn't fully engaged in the operation yet because we've been busy selling our house in Pittsford and relocating to Batavia. I split my time between news and ad sales. At the present moment, we're making a living. Your slam on our advertising model and "news on the cheap" shows a profound ignorance of the history of newspapers. Sorry to be blunt about it, but with a better understanding of the history of newspapers you might be a little more tolerant of where our development arch is at at the moment. I suggest you read up on the history of the penny press. Big news operations with big investigative staffs weren't born full throated in 1835. In fact, the newspaper as investigative organ is a relatively late 20th Century development. Up until the 50s or so, most investigation was confined to periodicals and books (few if any of the famous muckrackers, the founders of investigative journalism, were ever published in newspapers). I also suggest you read Lippmann's Liberty and the News to better understand what reforms he thought should be made in the news industry, which were subsequently largely misunderstood and sent 20th Century journalism on a rather incorrect course. It would be a mistake to assume that what you see of The Batavian today is what you'll see in 10 years, assuming survival. If we proceed according to plan, I suspect we'll employe a few journalists and have the resources to do the kind of journalism you seem to assume we're incapable of doing now. As for news being free, that would take an entire new post, but I'm tried of casting my pearls before swine on the paid content issue. The nonsense about expecting people to pay for news is so completely debunked both in my own blog as well as many others that I don't want to spend much time any longer. Besides, now that I'm completely online-only in my endevours it runs completely counter to my business interest to discourage publishers from charging for the content. I pray every day that they start on that foolhardy path. I have a business model ready for any aspiring publisher who wishes to take on paid-content newspaper web sites.