Online news players big and small are tripping over themselves to build Facebook applications.
more »|
|
|||||
|
Login
Search
This Month
Month Archive
who employs me
|
Monday, October 8
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 08 Oct 2007 11:45 PM EDT
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 08 Oct 2007 01:47 AM EDT
The editor of Novotya Gazeta, the newspaper that employed slain Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, said the identity of her killer is known, but not that of whoever might have ordered her murder. more »
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 08 Oct 2007 01:41 AM EDT
Staff at Newsday got a start when they saw three of the paper's Pulitzer prize medals listed on eBay (if you want to buy some as an alternative to earning them, they were going for US$15,500). more »
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 08 Oct 2007 01:37 AM EDT
Here's the Newsvine seed on this very topic. And here's some others:
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 08 Oct 2007 01:23 AM EDT
The Iraqi government thinks last month's shooting spree by Blackwater USA security personnel was unprovoked, is tanamount to murder and should be punished as such. The question now becomes, now what? more »
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 08 Oct 2007 01:11 AM EDT
Some are trying to lobby to save the tattered, historic little honky-tonk. (h/t to blamblog) See this earlier post for details. Saturday, October 6
by
billdoskoch
on Sat 06 Oct 2007 04:55 PM EDT
From The Shotgun (W-S's blog), some parting words by publisher Ezra Levant:
Make your own joke here. All snideness aside, putting out a magazine is tough work. Kudos to the Standard staff and management for taking the risk and trying to make the thing fly. (h/t to MyBlahg) Friday, October 5
by
billdoskoch
on Fri 05 Oct 2007 10:41 PM EDT
more »
by
billdoskoch
on Fri 05 Oct 2007 10:33 PM EDT
I forgot to post this last week. The Toronto Parking Authority expropriated The Matador at Dovercourt and College to make room for a 20-car parking lot, outraging musicians and heritage-lovers alike. more »
by
billdoskoch
on Fri 05 Oct 2007 10:23 PM EDT
I wrote a backgrounder on Pakistan's election and Musharraf's troubles.
Thursday, October 4
by
billdoskoch
on Thu 04 Oct 2007 09:42 PM EDT
Ontario NDP Leader Howard Hampton roasted the reporters today with this:
by
billdoskoch
on Thu 04 Oct 2007 09:38 PM EDT
I thought it packed a lot of heat for early October. And what's this I hear about a smog warning for Friday?
by
billdoskoch
on Thu 04 Oct 2007 09:34 PM EDT
by
billdoskoch
on Thu 04 Oct 2007 09:27 PM EDT
more »
by
billdoskoch
on Thu 04 Oct 2007 09:10 PM EDT
Here's the home page of Improbable Research, the magazine that sponsors the awards.
by
billdoskoch
on Thu 04 Oct 2007 06:52 PM EDT
I found myself up at Lawrence West and Dufferin today. As I headed towards the Lawrence subway station on the Dufferin bus, I saw a rather disturbing t-shirt dedicated to the theme of no snitching as I passed by the Lawrence Square Mall (Lawrence Heights, the infamous "Jungle," sits just to the north). "Warning: Snitch at own risk," read the shirt in one area, worn by a guy who, frankly, didn't look that hardcore to me. There was a hand holding a handgun in the background. There was also a stop sign graphic on the shirt with the word "snitching" on the sign. I know these shirts have been around for a while. According to this Wikipedia article, they first surfaced in 1999. I know some wear them more to provoke than anything. However, one reason I find them problematic is because of conversations like this, overheard on a Bathurst St. streetcar last night:
I find it sad that kids can have such a conversation with such a blasé tone. A question I can't answer is whether those kids know who shot their friend. If they do and they don't tell the cops, are they part of the problem? Remember Amon Beckles, shot to death at the funeral of a friend in 2005? He knew who shot his buddy, but wouldn't talk to the cops. "Too bad. Maybe if he did, he'd still be alive," I remember The Globe and Mail's Margaret Wente writing at the time. If such people chose to live the gangsta life and they die as a result, then too bad for them. Unfortunately, these guys tend to take people like Jane Creba, Shaquan Cadougan or Tamara Carter, the young girl wounded in 2004 on the Jane Street bus, with them. Carter got caught in the crossfire after some "gangstas" shot a guy who had asked them to pipe down on the bus. Here's a version of his story and what he has to say about those who say what happened and chose to say nothing:
If two gangstas want to shoot each other in a duel and the other gangstas want to keep their mouths shut about it, I suppose that's their business. If some chickenshit gangstas shoot an unarmed person on a bus, or wherever, and other people don't to step forward and help the cops remove these violent, nihilistic thugs from the streets, then they're contributing to the problem. They really should show some courage and snitch. Wednesday, October 3
by
billdoskoch
on Wed 03 Oct 2007 11:02 PM EDT
No End In Sight, a documentary by rookie filmmaker Charles Ferguson about the botching of the Iraq occupation, is a decent, well-meaning film for the most part (it screened at the Bloor tonight as part of the Doc Soup series). It will open in theatres on Friday. The film has come in for considerable critical acclaim, even winning the special documentary jury prize at Sundance earlier this year. But what Americans likely need, IMO, is a cogent look at why their country went to war in Iraq in the first place, not whether the occupation was botched or not (the answer to that question is a pretty obvious 'yes'). Overthrowing a vicious tyrant who allegedly had what turned out to be phantom weapons of mass destruction can only be seen as a pretext for the military action launched in March 2003. Would the U.S. really launch a war that could eventually cost more than US$1.8 trillion to bring "freedom" to a country if said country didn't sit above the world's second-largest conventional crude oil reserves? Personally, I suspect not. For an example, see this post: It's about the oil, stupid. I find it amusing the Bushies can't bring themselves to use the words "Iraq" and "oil" in the same sentence. Ferguson said he shied away from addressing the motives issue because he didn't want to make an ideological film. An understandable call, but a bad one just the same. Oil is likely to become more scarce in the coming decades. An economic replacement doesn't appear to be on the near horizon. If the world -- the United States in particular -- doesn't come to grips with its oil addiction, then I would say the possibility of further U.S.-led wars to bring "freedom" to countries that have significant supplies will remain exceedingly high. If Americans want to fool themselves that it will be okay to do so, provided that they conduct kinder and gentler invasions and occupations, I'm afraid the world has a problem.
by
billdoskoch
on Wed 03 Oct 2007 05:46 AM EDT
Why yes it is a catchy little promo for the NYT's blog page. Tuesday, October 2
by
billdoskoch
on Tue 02 Oct 2007 03:24 PM EDT
Home Depot wants to open an outlet at Portland and Queen W. as many long-time small businesses in the area die from a combination of rising rents and a changing business climate. more »
by
billdoskoch
on Tue 02 Oct 2007 02:02 PM EDT
A partial transcript of a chat with a Symantec representative. I found out the hard way that the newest versions of Norton Internet Security don't work with Win2000:
by
billdoskoch
on Tue 02 Oct 2007 09:08 AM EDT
Here's what Clancy had to say in the Toronto Sun story:
Oddly enough, the Star didn't report on this momentous event. :)
by
billdoskoch
on Tue 02 Oct 2007 08:53 AM EDT
Globeandmail.com -- which made a great leap forward in 2006 when it allowed people to comment directly on individual stories -- has added a 'most recommended' feature, allowing people to vote on whether they would recommend a given article to others. The site's most popular page already had lists of most read and e-mailed. There is also a list of most-commented-upon stories that shows up on the home page. Right now, however, the most-recommended results don't show up on the home page (yet?). Nor is there a prominent way to vote on recommending a story (see USA Today for a comparison; here's my reaction to its Web 2.0-ification). At globeandmail.com, you have to read the individual story all the way to the bottom (and who does that?) to see the link. TheStar.com has most read, e-mailed and searched. CBCNews.ca has most popular, e-mailed and blogged. CBC.ca and TheStar.com both display that information more prominently than globeandmail.com does. CTV.ca has a short list on its home page of the site's five most popular news stories. Canada.com appears to be bereft of such Web 2.0 bells and whistles. Monday, October 1
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 01 Oct 2007 05:31 PM EDT
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 01 Oct 2007 05:24 PM EDT
That concept is currently in operation at the foundation-owned St. Petersburg Times in Florida, and it's sparking discussion in an industry where the overwhelming pressure to preserve high profit margins is leading to a gutting of the journalistic mission. more »
by
billdoskoch
on Mon 01 Oct 2007 05:16 PM EDT
Yes, newspaper circulation is falling, but major U.S. newspapers aren't trying to reach everyone anymore. If the audience isn't of value to advertisers, then too bad, so sad for them. more » |
email this blog
Don't have a reader account, but still want to commend/castigate? Send an email.
recent articles
tweet o' the moment
News sites i can't live without
The craft
Blogs i admit to viewing
blogs i don't admit to viewing
muzeek
|
|||
