It's the cold calculus of the high-stakes world of U.S. network television news -- if your show's ratings go down, your prospects go down with them. And with ABC nipping at NBC's heels, the executive producer of NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams may pay the price.
more »|
|
||||
|
Login
Search
This Month
Month Archive
who employs me
|
Wednesday, February 28
by
Bill Doskoch
on Wed 28 Feb 2007 11:51 PM EST
Sunday, February 25
by
Bill Doskoch
on Sun 25 Feb 2007 01:18 PM EST
Since when did microlending, global poverty, constitutional law and civil wars in Africa become topics for frank discussion on fake-news comedy shows? Saturday, February 24
by
Bill Doskoch
on Sat 24 Feb 2007 02:39 AM EST
From the BBC's Matt Frei in Washington:
Friday, February 23
by
Bill Doskoch
on Fri 23 Feb 2007 05:57 PM EST
The Toronto Star's Antonia Zerbisias on the effects of the Quebecor starvation diet on the Toronto Sun. more »
by
Bill Doskoch
on Fri 23 Feb 2007 05:51 PM EST
From the AP story on globeandmail.com:
Sunday, February 18
by
Bill Doskoch
on Sun 18 Feb 2007 03:03 AM EST
Some people are finding self-discipline by publicly blogging about their credit card profligacy. more »
by
Bill Doskoch
on Sun 18 Feb 2007 02:54 AM EST
The NYT's Richard Siklos on the battle to control video on the Web. Basically, it's GoogleTube vs. the media companies. more »
by
Bill Doskoch
on Sun 18 Feb 2007 01:59 AM EST
A tiny TV news station in Santa Rosa, Ca. has gassed its news staff and wants to replace them with user-generated content from the community. more »Friday, February 16
by
Bill Doskoch
on Fri 16 Feb 2007 05:08 PM EST
The BBC has a series called The Conspiracy Files. It covers all your favourites: Princess Di, plus upcoming episodes on the Oklahoma City bombing, weapons inspector Dr. David Kelly and (wait for it) ... 9/11!! Unfortunately, Elvis and UFOs seem to be passé. There's a conspiracy quiz plus articles on why we love a good conspiracy theory and the roots of such theories. Say, why do you suppose the Beeb is really looking into this topic? I have a theory ... :^)
by
Bill Doskoch
on Fri 16 Feb 2007 11:37 AM EST
by
Bill Doskoch
on Fri 16 Feb 2007 02:28 AM EST
NYT media columnist David Carr on the remake of the cheeky New York Observer, which has produced some of the most amusing reporting about the Apple's media scene. more »
by
Bill Doskoch
on Fri 16 Feb 2007 02:05 AM EST
Thursday, February 15
by
Bill Doskoch
on Thu 15 Feb 2007 04:03 PM EST
Russell Smith writes in The Globe and Mail about the role of publicists in the modern media age -- and what journalists should do about it. more »
by
Bill Doskoch
on Thu 15 Feb 2007 01:39 PM EST
by
Bill Doskoch
on Thu 15 Feb 2007 01:12 PM EST
Macleans.ca has an interesting new feature. They have a panel called the Macleans 50. From the blurb:
Essentially, the M-50, which includes Macleans journalists, can post comments on the stories Macleans.ca is covering that day. See this one on Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach arguing for federal climate change money, as an example. Now, how about the hoi polloi -- you know, you and I? Can we chip in to the conversation? Well, er, no. At least, not that I can see. This feature is strictly for those with something to actually say. But the lessers are welcome to press their nose to the glass. While I'm not really down with that principle (I don't think journalists should be above talking with their readers), it is potentially an interesting and useful way to broaden out a story. For one thing, now reporters won't have to call sources for reaction! They just post now! Woo-hoo!! :) However, I wonder what obligation has been imposed on the M-50 to post comments, or how they find out about new posts. For example, there's a story up on Parliament passing the Kyoto bill. I wouldn't mind seeing what John Duffy, Mr. Climate Liberal himself, has to say about it. As I write this, however, no comment from Mr. Duffy. Am I expected to click on the story several more times over the course of the day to see what his reaction might be? How long does Macleans think visitors will put up with that? I don't want to repeatedly revisit the same story just to see if an M-50 has deigned to comment.*
However, I suppose we shall see how it all unfolds over time. In any event, giving more voice to those with a voice can't be seen as a bad thing. :) Afterword Duffy never did comment on that story, although Tory blogger Stephen Taylor did. Allan Rock, a one-time Liberal justice minister, is one of the M-50. There was a story posted on Prime Minister Stephen Harper's desire to appoint law-and-order-friendly judges. You'd think he'd be a natural. It might have been interesting to see him mix it up over the issue with Guy Giorno, former chief of staff to Mike Harris, or John Reynolds, a former Conservative MP turned backroom player. Alas, it didn't happen. I clicked on the bio of Adam Radwanski, managing editor of Macleans.ca, and he hasn't issued a comment for a week. A couple Macleans staffers haven't commented at all, which drops it to the M-48 at the very least. :)
by
Bill Doskoch
on Thu 15 Feb 2007 04:21 AM EST
The U.S. electrical industry can't see getting GHG emissions down below 1990 levels until some time in the 2020s. more »
by
Bill Doskoch
on Thu 15 Feb 2007 04:07 AM EST
Firedoglake.com has a team of six bloggers covering the Scooter Libby perjury trial. Their only real disappointment? The defence won't put the Scootmeister or Cheney on the stand. more » |
email this blog
Don't have a reader account, but still want to commend/castigate? Send an email.
recent articles
News sites i can't live without
The craft
Blogs i admit to viewing
blogs i don't admit to viewing
Amusements, diversions
muzeek
|
||