The New York Times News Service will lay off at least 25 editorial employees next year, and will move the editing of the service to a Florida newspaper owned by The New York Times Company, The Times and the Newspaper Guild said on Thursday. ...
The plan calls for The Gainesville Sun, whose newsroom is not unionized and has lower salaries, to take over the editing of the news service. Ms. McNulty said new jobs would be created at The Sun to handle the extra work. Five of the top news service employees will retain their jobs in New York.
Ruth Teichrob -- formerly of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which shut down in March -- surveyed her former newsroom colleagues to see how they are doing. Seventy-one of 140 responded.
For all the sound and fury, citizen journalism once again did nothing but spread misinformation at a time when thousands people with family at the base would have been freaking out already, and breach the privacy of those who had been killed or wounded. We learned not a single new fact, nor was a single life saved.
Citizen journalism and social media defenders rode to the rescue.
This could well be the future of media. A correspondent emailed me the link to this Wired story: "The Answer Factory: Demand Media and the Fast, Disposable, and Profitable as Hell Media Model."
Last Thursday, CBC TV's The National hosted a panel discussion on the media's coverage of the swine flu issue. It featured Dr. Allison McGeer, an infectious disease consultant at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, and Dr. Richard Schabas, a former chief medical officer of health for Ontario.
Here are some tweets I made, in chronological order:
While travelling in the Ukraine in the fall of 1989, I met up with a fellow named Tom Koppel, a journalist working for a communist newspaper in Kyiv on an exchange program.
With the 20th anniversary coming of the fall of the Berlin Wall on Nov. 9, 1989, I thought I'd excerpt an article I wrote for Bulletin, then the magazine of the Canadian Association of Journalists. It was published in the Fall 1990 issue and outlines how the paper that hosted Koppel covered the Wall story:
John Miller, before he became a Ryerson j-prof, toiled at 1 Yonge St, home of the (once mighty?) Toronto Star. He's mortified by the paper's apparent plan to outsource its editing and page production work.
Earlier this week the Toronto Star announced, among other changes, that it was planning to outsource some one hundred in-house, union editing jobs. In the press release issued by the union in the wake of the announcement, union chief Maureen Dawson explained that "Journalism is a collaborative effort, the product of a team of reporters, photographers and editors working in concert to produce the kind of activist agenda that has served Star readers and our community so well for so long...To remove a critical element of that work is to shortchange everyone who depends on it."
Now, one (apparent) editor at the Star has decided to show us all the benefits of collaboration. An extensively marked-up copy of Publisher John Cruickshank's internal memo announcing the changes was sent to Torontoist by a self-described "intermediary who was asked to send this for a friend who works at the Star" this morning; it's, allegedly, "the work of a Star editor."
Jayson Blair, whose fabrications triggered the worst ethics crisis in the history of the New York Times and cost two very senior editors their jobs, will be speaking later today at a journalism ethics conference.
James Poniewozik makes an argument out of a point that I've long believed; centrism can be a form of bias. It's about coverage of American politics, but ask yourself whether the same effect plays out in this country.
This isn't a new story, but this is certainly a poignant photo essay at the BBC website -- a visual record of dead British pubs, as captured by Chris Etchell (seen first on Twitter).
I also asked Schmidt about the concept of a “hyperpersonalized news stream,” coined by Google VP Marissa Mayer to describe a customized flow of information from a broad range of news sources. Does Google have aspirations to build on that concept?
Schmidt: We have about ten news stream ideas, of which hyperpersonalization is one. And, again, I’d rather not talk about specific products or even prioritize them, but I would make the following observation: In five or ten years, what will the primary news reader look like?
Well, that person will be probably on a tablet or a mobile phone, probably the majority of the reading will presumably be online not offline, just because of the scale of it. It’ll be highly personalized, right? So you’ll know who the person is. There’ll be a lot of integration of media — so video, voice, what have you. It’ll be advertising-supported and subscription-supported, so you’ll probably have a mixture. Think of the Kindle as an example. The Kindle is a proto of what this thing could look like. People will carry these things around.
So if you start thinking about that, it becomes pretty obvious what the products need to be: more personalized, much deeper, capable of deeper navigation into a subject. Also, show me the differential. Since you know what you told me yesterday, just tell me what changed today. Don’t repeat everything.
As an aside, I posted the following on Twitter to see what the deep thinkers would say:
Why shouldn't 'hyper-personalized' news be thought of as another form of filter
failure?
Peter McNelly, who once toiled in the Corpse's trenches (and had been a CTV News consultant), finds some good things to say about the CBC News redesign.
How drastic? Publisher John Cruickshank is calling it the biggest restructuring in the company's history. And if some early musings are correct, copy editors could be the big losers.
